ONLY TWO MORE YEARS FOR THE DRAGON LADY?

In its Fiscal Year 2024 budget request earlier this year, the US Air Force indicated a U-2 retirement date in FY 2026. However, HQ USAF said last week that the plan is to end operations in the very first month of FY2026, eg October 2025.

In a written response to my questions about the planned retirement that was facilitated by Ken Bray, a former U-2 pilot who is now the Associate Deputy Chief of Staff for ISR, HQ USAF said that the service has not yet sent the written certification to Congress, that is required to overturn a provision in the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This prohibits retirement of the U-2 until USAF can certify that a less costly but equally or better capable replacement is available. The waiver is “still in staffing”.

Previous attempts by the USAF to retire the U-2 have not only been foiled by Congress, but also by objections from the Combatant Commanders (COCOMs). Members of the U-2 Brotherhood are hoping for similar interventions this time. But the USAF told me that “as a matter of course, the Joint Staff has solicited input from the Combatant Commands and the USAF conducts on-going engagements with the Combatant Commands to articulate the capabilities and associated timelines that will mitigate the divestment of legacy assets.”

If the USAF gets its way and keeps to its timescale, it seems logical to immediately begin running down the training program for new pilots, and Periodic Deport Maintenance at Palmdale and Beale. “After delivery of the certification to Congress, the USAF will establish a deliberate plan to manage the drawdown of the U-2 fleet, program closeout, and redistribution of manpower,” it said.

But what does not seem logical is that an “Avionics Technical Refresh” (ATR) for the U-2 is underway at the Skunk Works. This updates the aircraft’s navigation and communications systems, and cockpit displays, including touch screens. It also provides a new mission computer that is compliant with the USAF’s Open Mission Systems (OMS) standards.

In a recent press release, Lockheed Martin announced the maiden flight of the first ATR-modified jet. Sean Thatcher, the ATR program manager at Palmdale, said this first flight “is a significant moment in our journey to rapidly and affordably field new capabilities. Further testing will solidify a mature software baseline before mission systems are introduced.” The contract to upgrade eight aircraft with the ATR was awarded in 2020 and is worth $50 million, according to Lockheed Martin.

Furthermore, that sum does not include upgrades to the U-2 sensors, and other improvements, many of which I listed here. From examining the budget documents, I conclude that some $412 million has been spent to date on the ASARS 2B/C imaging radar, with a new active antenna and processor, including RDT&E.

Then there is all the other RDT&E plus procurement spending on the U-2 in recent years (“prior years” according to the budget documents, plus FYs 2022 and 2023). This comes to nearly $790 million. And in FY 2024, the projected spend is $44.1 million on ASARS-2B/C and $29.5 million on the ATR, which is going onto eight aircraft. But the first two are not scheduled join the operational fleet until July next year – just over one year before that fleet is phased out.

In all, these are extraordinary sums for an aircraft that is being retired so soon.

The USAF says publicly that satellite reconnaissance can replace the U-2. But it also plans to replace the Dragon Lady with the still-classified Penetrating-ISR UAV. HQ USAF declined to answer my question on the status of what has become known as The White Bat, for “national security reasons”.

7 thoughts on “ONLY TWO MORE YEARS FOR THE DRAGON LADY?

  1. They will most likely keep the 8 aircraft w/updates. The rest for scalping parts!
    Another sad day in history for the high fliers. Like the SR-71 gone before it’s time.

    Like

    • The U-2 has outlasted the SR-71’s service life because it is cheaper to maintain and operate in contrast to the design philosophy of the SR-71 and its engine placement making full-bore maintenance of the SR-71 quite a huge chore.

      With three U-2s retired over the past four months (one of them being a TU-2S). I might feel inclined to agree with your prediction about the number of operational U-2s being pruned to 8-10 by the end of the 2020s for the following reasons:

      • One of the operational U-2s having flown with artificial intelligence for the first time in December 2020
      • The four remaining first-generation U-2Rs ordered in the late 1960s being older than other U-2s and thus ripe for retirement
      • A possibility that money saved by gradually retiring the U-2 could be used for keeping the RQ-170s, Global Hawks, and Northrop Grumman unmanned P-ISR flying wings airworthy

      Like

  2. More typical political garbage made up by clueless idiots who have no clue how to successfully prosecute a war, let alone provide for a strong intelligence framework.

    Like

    • SHACK! That’s what happens when you have less than qualified military members entrenched at the highest level staff jobs because they suffer from MOA – manifestation of apprehension – they fear flying – they fear being in a tank on the battlefield – they fear being in the trenches – they enjoy staff jobs so they can be safe – I saw it a LOT, and these types don’t know how to develop a strong defense let alone executing finesse on the battlefield or in the air – I’m sue that North Korea, China, Russia, and our mid-East enemies are celebrating

      Like

  3. It’s really hard to understand what’s in the minds of the senior Air Force leaders. The A-10 was retired because Air Force leader said fighters could do the same job (which is hard to believe). Now the U-2 is to be retired because satellites can do the job. It appears that the real motivation is to hit an unrealistically low budgetary number with the least amount of public outcry than a well-thought decision to retire an intelligence platform. It will be a sad day if the Dragon Lady is indeed retired without an equivalent replacement.

    Like

Leave a comment